How does selective evidence impact an argument?

Selective evidence impacts an argument primarily by biasing it through the omission of opposing viewpoints. When an argument relies on selective evidence, it often includes only those pieces of information that support its claims while disregarding evidence that may contradict or challenge those claims. This can mislead an audience by creating a one-sided perspective, as it prevents them from seeing a fuller and more balanced picture of the issue at hand. By not presenting opposing arguments or evidence, the argument can appear stronger than it actually is, but this is at the cost of fairness and intellectual honesty. Thus, the use of selective evidence ultimately undermines the argument's credibility and can skew the audience's understanding of the topic.